These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 2111833

  • 21. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ, Wild T, Jensen ME.
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Jun; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Olsen BT, Garcia-Godoy F, Marshall TD, Barnwell GM.
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 2513842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE, Maxymiw WG, McComb D.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Jun; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial.
    Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, McCabe JF.
    Br Dent J; 1995 Sep 09; 179(5):175-9. PubMed ID: 7546970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children.
    Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999 Sep 09; 66(2):93-7, 84. PubMed ID: 10431617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb 09; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 09; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009 Feb 09; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Glass-ionomer-silver-cermet interim Class I restorations for permanent teeth.
    Croll TP, Killian CM.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Nov 09; 23(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1305287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ, Connolly J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar 09; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.