These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 21130060

  • 21. Craniomandibular pain, oral parafunctions, and psychological stress in a longitudinal case study.
    van Selms MK, Lobbezoo F, Wicks DJ, Hamburger HL, Naeije M.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 31(8):738-45. PubMed ID: 15265208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Oral parafunctions and positive clinical examination findings.
    Kobs G, Bernhardt O, Kocher T, Meyer G.
    Stomatologija; 2005 Aug; 7(3):81-3. PubMed ID: 16340272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clenching and grinding: effect on masseter and sternocleidomastoid electromyographic activity in healthy subjects.
    Venegas M, Valdivia J, Fresno MJ, Miralles R, Gutiérrez MF, Valenzuela S, Fuentes A.
    Cranio; 2009 Jul; 27(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 19697643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of neurofeedback and electromyographic-biofeedback therapy on improving hand function in stroke patients.
    Rayegani SM, Raeissadat SA, Sedighipour L, Rezazadeh IM, Bahrami MH, Eliaspour D, Khosrawi S.
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2014 Jul; 21(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 24710974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Assessment of awake bruxism-Combinational analysis of ecological momentary assessment and electromyography.
    Asami K, Fujisawa M, Saito-Murakami K, Miura S, Fujita T, Imamura Y, Koyama S.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan 16; 68(1):166-171. PubMed ID: 37286504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The effect of an interocclusal appliance on bite force and masseter electromyography in asymptomatic subjects and patients with temporomandibular pain and dysfunction.
    Chandu A, Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Borromeo GL.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun 16; 31(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 15189309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effectiveness of Biofeedback in Individuals with Awake Bruxism Compared to Other Types of Treatment: A Systematic Review.
    Vieira MA, Oliveira-Souza AIS, Hahn G, Bähr L, Armijo-Olivo S, Ferreira APL.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan 14; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Electromyographic biofeedback training for reducing muscle pain and tension on masseter and temporal muscles: A pilot study.
    Criado L, de La Fuente A, Heredia M, Montero J, Albaladejo A, Criado JM.
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Dec 14; 8(5):e571-e576. PubMed ID: 27957273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effects of 5 days of repeated submaximal clenching on masticatory muscle pain and tenderness: an experimental study.
    Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L.
    J Orofac Pain; 1996 Dec 14; 10(4):330-8. PubMed ID: 9161238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effects of activator on masticatory muscle activity during daytime and sleep.
    Ueda HM, Tabe H, Kato M, Nagaoka K, Nakashima Y, Shikata N, Tanne K.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Oct 14; 30(10):1030-5. PubMed ID: 12974864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Relationships between jaw pain and jaw muscle contraction level: underlying factors and treatment effectiveness.
    Sherman RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jul 14; 54(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 3860646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Influence of alteration of occlusal relationship on activity of jaw closing muscles and mandibular movement during submaximal clenching.
    Baba K, Akishige S, Yaka T, Ai M.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Sep 14; 27(9):793-801. PubMed ID: 11012855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Influence of muscle pain tolerance on muscle pain threshold in experimental tooth clenching in man.
    Christensen LV.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1979 Jul 14; 6(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 287768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effect of EMG biofeedback training of gluteus maximus muscle on gait parameters in incomplete spinal cord injury.
    Govil K, Noohu MM.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013 Jul 14; 33(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 23949032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Experimental tooth clenching. A model for studying mechanisms of muscle pain.
    Dawson A.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2013 Jul 14; (228):9-94. PubMed ID: 23631112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of masticatory activity during unilateral single tooth clenching using muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Okada C, Yamaguchi S, Watanabe Y, Watanabe M, Hattori Y.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Aug 14; 43(8):583-90. PubMed ID: 27113040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Tooth contact versus clenching: oral parafunctions and facial pain.
    Glaros AG, Williams K.
    J Orofac Pain; 2012 Aug 14; 26(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 22838002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Predictors of bruxism, other oral parafunctions, and tooth wear over a 20-year follow-up period.
    Carlsson GE, Egermark I, Magnusson T.
    J Orofac Pain; 2003 Aug 14; 17(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 12756931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Balance in masticatory muscle activity during natural chewing and submaximal clenching.
    McCarroll RS, Naeije M, Hansson TL.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Sep 14; 16(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 2809846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Preliminary study of wireless biofeedback therapy for treatment of bruxism].
    Gu WP, Yin XM, Zhang FM, Wei XL, Qian ZY, Wang C.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb 14; 48(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 23714064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.