These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 21144570

  • 1. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
    Rodríguez AL, Rijsselaere T, Bijttebier J, Vyt P, Van Soom A, Maes D.
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar 15; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs M, De Vliegher S, De Schauwer C, Govaere J, Smits K, Hoflack G, de Kruif A, Van Soom A.
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan 01; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
    Vyt P, Maes D, Rijsselaere T, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Van Soom A.
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec 01; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T, Mizuno I, Okumura A, Fuse H.
    Arch Androl; 2005 Dec 01; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II-C) for bull semen analysis.
    Hoflack G, Rijsselaere T, Maes D, Dewulf J, Opsomer G, de Kruif A, Van Soom A.
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Jun 01; 40(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15943698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A, Sharma RK.
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan 01; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparison of the parameters obtained by sperm quality analyzer V and computer-aided sperm analysis system].
    Ge YF, Wang CH, Shao Y, Yao B, Wu D, Xia XY, Shang XJ, Huang YF.
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Oct 01; 14(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 19157106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Use of a sperm quality analyser on semen of turkey breeders to monitor storage time effects and age-related changes during a reproductive cycle.
    Neuman SL, McDaniel CD, Frank L, Radu J, Hester PY.
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul 01; 43(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 12195807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.
    Suzuki T, Shibahara H, Tsunoda H, Hirano Y, Taneichi A, Obara H, Takamizawa S, Sato I.
    Int J Androl; 2002 Feb 01; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11869377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Utilisation of a sperm quality analyser to evaluate sperm quantity and quality of turkey breeders.
    Neuman SL, McDaniel CD, Frank L, Radu J, Einstein ME, Hester PY.
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul 01; 43(3):457-64. PubMed ID: 12195806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.
    Sutkeviciene N, Andersson MA, Zilinskas H, Andersson M.
    Theriogenology; 2005 Feb 01; 63(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 15629793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of cryopreservation on goat semen characteristics related to sperm freezability.
    Dorado J, Muñoz-Serrano A, Hidalgo M.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Aug 01; 121(1-2):115-23. PubMed ID: 20462708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
    Christensen P, Knudsen DB, Wachmann H, Madsen MT.
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct 01; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sperm chromatin structural integrity in normospermic boars is not related to semen storage and fertility after routine AI.
    Waberski D, Schapmann E, Henning H, Riesenbeck A, Brandt H.
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan 15; 75(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 20961609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation.
    Thurston LM, Watson PF, Mileham AJ, Holt WV.
    J Androl; 2001 Jan 15; 22(3):382-94. PubMed ID: 11330638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo.
    Tardif S, Laforest JP, Cormier N, Bailey JL.
    Theriogenology; 1999 Aug 15; 52(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 10734379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In Vitro Measures for Assessing Boar Semen Fertility.
    Jung M, Rüdiger K, Schulze M.
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2015 Jul 15; 50 Suppl 2():20-4. PubMed ID: 26174915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Additional value of computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination.
    Broekhuijse ML, Soštarić E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM.
    Theriogenology; 2011 Nov 15; 76(8):1473-86.e1. PubMed ID: 21872316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD, Nizanski W, Batkowski F, Savic MA.
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul 01; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of storage duration, storage temperature, and diluent on the viability and fertility of fresh ram sperm.
    O'Hara L, Hanrahan JP, Richardson L, Donovan A, Fair S, Evans AC, Lonergan P.
    Theriogenology; 2010 Mar 01; 73(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 20004009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.