These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
267 related items for PubMed ID: 21147835
21. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology? Lavy Y, Lev-Sagie A, Holtzer H, Revel A, Hurwitz A. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 May 10; 114(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15099873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography. Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, Zhou W. J Reprod Med; 2012 May 10; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of hysterosalpingograms with laparoscopy in the diagnostic of tubal factor of female infertility at the Yaoundé General Hospital, Cameroon. Ngowa JD, Kasia JM, Georges NT, Nkongo V, Sone C, Fongang E. Pan Afr Med J; 2015 May 10; 22():264. PubMed ID: 26958127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of color Doppler mapping for tubal patency. Demir B, Kocak M, Beydilli G, Kaplan M, Gelisen O, Haberal A. J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul 10; 37(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 21395904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening strategies for tubal factor subfertility. den Hartog JE, Lardenoije CM, Severens JL, Land JA, Evers JL, Kessels AG. Hum Reprod; 2008 Aug 10; 23(8):1840-8. PubMed ID: 18579509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden M, Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM. Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep 10; 64(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 7641899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice? Dhaliwal LK, Gupta KR, Aggarwal N. Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999 Sep 10; 44(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 10499744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography to diagnose tubal pathology in the work-up of subfertile women, a randomised clinical trial. Tros R, van Kessel MA, van Kuijk SMJ, Oosterhuis GJE, Kuchenbecker WKH, Kwee J, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May 10; 236():127-132. PubMed ID: 30903885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hogerzeil HV. Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jul 10; 35(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10930765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies of Echovist-200 including 1007 women. Holz K, Becker R, Schürmann R. Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997 Jul 10; 119(8):366-73. PubMed ID: 9286072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hysterosalpingography findings of female partners of infertile couple attending fertility clinic at Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Makwe CC, Ugwu AO, Sunmonu OH, Yusuf-Awesu SA, Ani-Ugwu NK, Olumakinwa OE. Pan Afr Med J; 2021 Jul 10; 40():223. PubMed ID: 35145585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Complementary use of hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in 100 infertile patients: results and comparison of their diagnostic accuracy. La Sala GB, Sacchetti F, Degl'Incerti-Tocci F, Dessanti L, Torrelli MG. Acta Eur Fertil; 1987 Jul 10; 18(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 2970197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing. Emanuel MH, van Vliet M, Weber M, Exalto N. Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan 10; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative study of the efficacy of sonosalpingography and hysterosalpingogram to test the tubal patency in all women with primary and secondary infertility. Malik B, Patil S, Boricha BG, Kurkal N, Choudhry M. Ultrasound Q; 2014 Jun 10; 30(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 24850029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study. Volondat M, Fontas E, Delotte J, Fatfouta I, Chevallier P, Chassang M. Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb 10; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Hysterosalpingography versus laparoscopy in tubal infertility: comparison based on findings at laparatomy. Okonofua FE, Essen UI, Nimalaraj T. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Feb 10; 28(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 2563701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy for tubal patency in infertile women. Foroozanfard F, Sadat Z. Nurs Midwifery Stud; 2013 Jun 10; 2(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 25414857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in the work-up for subfertility: a randomized controlled trial. van Kessel M, Tros R, van Kuijk S, Oosterhuis J, Kuchenbecker W, Bongers M, Mol BW, Koks C. Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Aug 10; 43(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 34253451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic hydrotubation in diagnosis of tubal patency. Adelusi B, al-Nuaim L, Makanjuola D, Khashoggi T, Chowdhury N, Kangave D. Fertil Steril; 1995 May 10; 63(5):1016-20. PubMed ID: 7720910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]