These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

267 related items for PubMed ID: 21147835

  • 41. Hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of infertility: a five years review. (FGAE, 2001 -5).
    Kitilla T.
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Oct; 48(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21280428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast-Sonography for the Assessment of Tubal Patency in Women with Infertility: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
    Alcázar JL, Martinez-Astorquiza Corral T, Orozco R, Dominguez-Piriz J, Juez L, Errasti T.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016 Oct; 81(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 26824833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Chlamydial serology and histerosalpingography in predicting tubal disease in infertility patients.
    Fiçicioğlu C, Api M.
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1995 Oct; 26(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 9098470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile Iranian women with tubal factor.
    Mohammadbeigi R, Tanhaeivash R.
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):841-3. PubMed ID: 23379192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. The value of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology among infertile patients.
    Tvarijonaviciene E, Nadisauskiene RJ.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2008 Nov; 44(6):439-48. PubMed ID: 18660638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Fertility-related quality of life in subfertile women undergoing tubal testing with transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy or hysterosalpingography.
    van Kessel MA, Paulussen M, Tros R, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jul; 274():19-22. PubMed ID: 35561566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Role and application of hysterosalpingography and Fallopian tube recanalization.
    Mallarini G, Saba L.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Dec; 62(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 21079576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. The limited value of hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal status and fertility potential.
    Karande VC, Pratt DE, Rabin DS, Gleicher N.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Jun; 63(6):1167-71. PubMed ID: 7750583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. A second hysterosalpingography reduces the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction.
    Dessole S, Meloni GB, Capobianco G, Manzoni MA, Ambrosini G, Canalis GC.
    Fertil Steril; 2000 May; 73(5):1037-9. PubMed ID: 10785234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 May; 75(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 23296258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
    Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Johns DA, Luciano AA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Pelvic factor infertility: diagnosis and prognosis of various procedures.
    Bulletti C, Panzini I, Borini A, Coccia E, Setti PL, Palagiano A.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1127():73-82. PubMed ID: 18443333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Hysterosalpingography in the assessment of proximal tubal pathology: a review of congenital and acquired abnormalities.
    Zafarani F, Ghaffari F, Ahmadi F, Soleimani Mehranjani M, Shahrzad G.
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jun 01; 94(1122):20201386. PubMed ID: 33914616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Association between secondary infertility and fallopian tube obstruction on hysterosalpingography.
    Lash MM, Yaghamee A, Strohsnitter W, Lalwani S.
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Sep 01; 53(9):677-80. PubMed ID: 18839820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Hysterosalpingography with selective salpingography.
    Vardhana PA, Silberzweig JE, Guarnaccia M, Sauer MV.
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Mar 01; 54(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 19370895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Tubo-peritoneal infertility: comparision of pre-operative hysterosalpingography and laparotomy findings (Tikur Anbessa Hospital, 1995 - 2002).
    Kitilla T.
    Ethiop Med J; 2006 Apr 01; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 17447380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Evidence-based medicine for diagnostic questions.
    Evers JL, Land JA, Mol BW.
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb 01; 21(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 12806555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. [Radiologic versus ultrasound fallopian tube imaging. Painfulness of the examination and diagnostic reliability of hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingo-contrast-ultrasonography with echovist 200].
    Korell M, Seehaus D, Strowitzki T, Hepp H.
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Feb 01; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9173524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Comparation of magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingosonography for the assessment of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang J, Zhang X, Bian J, Wang C.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jan 21; 101(3):e28532. PubMed ID: 35060509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Radionuclide hysterosalpingography is not predictive in the diagnosis of infertility.
    Lundberg S, Wramsby H, Bremmer S, Lundberg HJ, Asard PE.
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Feb 21; 69(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 9496331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.