These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

217 related items for PubMed ID: 21172601

  • 1. The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Haidich AB, Birtsou C, Dardavessis T, Tirodimos I, Arvanitidou M.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):124-35. PubMed ID: 21172601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Low quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trials.
    de Vries TW, van Roon EN.
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 Dec; 95(12):1023-6. PubMed ID: 20551194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.
    Xu L, Li J, Zhang M, Ai C, Wang L.
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 18579449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement.
    Kane RL, Wang J, Garrard J.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17292017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement].
    Gøtzsche PC, CONSORT-gruppen.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Apr 04; 167(14):1520-2. PubMed ID: 15887748
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
    Scales CD, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P.
    J Urol; 2007 Mar 04; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.
    Dechartres A, Charles P, Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Altman DG.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb 04; 64(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 20705426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [A standard method for reporting ramdomized medical scientific research; the 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT)].
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 May 09; 142(19):1089-91. PubMed ID: 9623225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.