These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

87 related items for PubMed ID: 21174750

  • 21. [Various uncomfortable loudness thresholds, their correlation and use in general practice].
    Brügel FJ, Schorn K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Nov; 71(11):572-5. PubMed ID: 1463566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
    Oeding K, Valente M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
    Keith RW.
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979 Jun; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A Laboratory Evaluation of Contextual Factors Affecting Ratings of Speech in Noise: Implications for Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Jenstad LM, Gillen L, Singh G, DeLongis A, Pang F.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jun; 40(4):823-832. PubMed ID: 30557223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
    Margolis RH.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 4046582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM, Gilmore C.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Derivation of frequency-gain characteristics for maximizing speech reception in noise.
    Rankovic CM.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):913-29. PubMed ID: 7474983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Relationship between loudness tolerance and the acceptance of background noise for young adults with normal hearing.
    Franklin CA, White LJ, Franklin TC.
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Jun; 114(3):717-22. PubMed ID: 22913014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Chosen Listening Levels for Music With and Without the Use of Hearing Aids.
    Croghan NB, Swanberg AM, Anderson MC, Arehart KH.
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Sep 01; 25(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 27669061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise.
    Beach EF, Williams W, Gilliver M.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun 01; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 22380619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.
    Christen R, Byrne D.
    Scand Audiol; 1980 Jun 01; 9(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7444317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of unaided MCLs and use-gain of hearing aids.
    Shapiro I.
    Scand Audiol; 1978 Jun 01; 7(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 756081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of three hearing aid prescription procedures.
    Shapiro I.
    Ear Hear; 1980 Jun 01; 1(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 7409358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.