These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
774 related items for PubMed ID: 21195283
1. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Cha BK, Choi DS, Ngan P, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Kim SM, Jang IS. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary protaction with zygomatic anchorage in a growing class III patient. Aldaz J, Andrade D, Aguilar E, Bravo M. Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 31056418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax. Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Drescher D. World J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report. Hong H, Ngan P, Han G, Qi LG, Wei SH. Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 15898388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion. Ngan P, Wei SH, Hagg U, Yiu CK, Merwin D, Stickel B. Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E. Prog Orthod; 2015 Mar; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Maxillary protraction at early ages. The revolution of new bone anchorage appliances. Solano-Mendoza B, Iglesias-Linares A, Yañez-Vico RM, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Alió-Sanz JJ, Solano-Reina E. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012 Mar; 37(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 23534334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion. León-Salazar V, Janson G, de Freitas MR, de Almeida RR, León-Salazar R. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):736-45. PubMed ID: 19892292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of intermaxillary forces in early treatment of maxillary deficient class III patients: results of a case series. Coscia G, Addabbo F, Peluso V, D'Ambrosio E. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e350-4. PubMed ID: 22421469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion. Lee SH, Koh SD, Chung DH, Lee JW, Lee SM. Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr 01; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction of skeletal class III in a growing male patient by reverse pull facemask. Kapoor P, Kharbanda OP. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011 Apr 01; 29(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 21985889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary expansion and protraction in correction of midface retrusion in a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patient. Kawakami M, Yagi T, Takada K. Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug 01; 72(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12169036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class III growing patients with severe space deficiency: A report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction. Lin HY, Yang H, Lai EH, Lin SY, Chang JZ. J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Apr 01; 119(4):869-878. PubMed ID: 31331705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]