These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

276 related items for PubMed ID: 21195384

  • 1. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL, Gray KM, Quiner TE, Bodea Braescu A, Gerkin R, Perlow JH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D, Feng L, Xu L, Li C, Zhang Q.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C, Verma A, Soni A, Thusoo M, Mahajan VK, Verma S.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
    Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Mar; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure.
    Patel RM, Cayo M, Patel A, Albarillo M, Puri L.
    Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e641-6. PubMed ID: 22588404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep 12; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.