These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

202 related items for PubMed ID: 21196829

  • 1. Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine.
    Trullenque-Eriksson A, Guisado-Moya B.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May 01; 16(3):e390-6. PubMed ID: 21196829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
    Gregorio LV, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Modena KC, Colombini BL, Calvo AM, Sipert CR, Dionísio TJ, Lauris JR, Faria FA, Trindade Junior AS, Santos CF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul 01; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction.
    Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Muñoz-López JL, Vallecillo-Capilla MF, Reyes-Botella C.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec 01; 22(9):2981-2988. PubMed ID: 29450738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial.
    Sancho-Puchades M, Vílchez-Pérez MÁ, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Paredes-García J, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 May 01; 17(3):e462-8. PubMed ID: 22143739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Mittal J, Kaur G, Mann HS, Narang S, Kamra M, Kapoor S, Sindhi M, Kataria R.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun 01; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery.
    Senes AM, Calvo AM, Colombini-Ishikiriama BL, Gonçalves PZ, Dionísio TJ, Sant'ana E, Brozoski DT, Lauris JR, Faria FA, Santos CF.
    J Dent Res; 2015 Sep 01; 94(9 Suppl):166S-73S. PubMed ID: 26202994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
    Santos CF, Modena KC, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Calvo AM, Colombini BL, Sipert CR, Dionísio TJ, Faria FA, Trindade AS, Lauris JR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec 01; 65(12):2445-52. PubMed ID: 18022467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Yang F, Gao Y, Zhang L, Zheng B, Wang L, Sun H, Huang D.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov 01; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
    Sierra Rebolledo A, Delgado Molina E, Berini Aytís L, Gay Escoda C.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar 01; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Efficacy of analgesia promoted by lidocaine and articaine in third molar extraction surgery. A split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial.
    de Souza Santos S, Bonatto MS, Mendes PGJ, Martins AVB, Pereira DA, de Oliveira GJPL.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun 01; 28(2):919-924. PubMed ID: 38355872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: prospective, randomized crossover study.
    Thakare A, Bhate K, Kathariya R.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2014 Jun 01; 52(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 25016509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: contribution of the use of long-acting local anesthetics, low-power laser, and diclofenac.
    Marković AB, Todorović L.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov 01; 102(5):e4-8. PubMed ID: 17052624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Efficiency of bupivacaine versus lidocaine and methylprednisolone versus placebo to reduce postoperative pain and swelling after surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical trial.
    Christensen J, Matzen LH, Vaeth M, Wenzel A, Schou S.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep 01; 71(9):1490-9. PubMed ID: 23866780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
    Colombini BL, Modena KC, Calvo AM, Sakai VT, Giglio FP, Dionísio TJ, Trindade AS, Lauris JR, Santos CF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug 01; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Postoperative pain after bupivacaine supplementation in mandibular third molar surgery: splint-mouth randomized double blind controlled clinical trial.
    de Souza AM, Horliana AC, Simone JL, Jorge WA, Tortamano IP.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec 01; 18(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 25338961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomized clinical trial of anesthetic efficacy.
    Kämmerer PW, Palarie V, Daubländer M, Bicer C, Shabazfar N, Brüllmann D, Al-Nawas B.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Apr 01; 113(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 22676931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.
    Karm MH, Park FD, Kang M, Kim HJ, Kang JW, Kim S, Kim YD, Kim CH, Seo KS, Kwon KH, Kim CH, Lee JW, Hong SW, Lim MH, Nam SK, Cho JM.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May 01; 96(21):e6753. PubMed ID: 28538371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.
    Pellicer-Chover H, Cervera-Ballester J, Sanchis-Bielsa JM, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B.
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2013 Apr 01; 5(2):e66-71. PubMed ID: 24455059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Tokuç B, Coşkunses FM.
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Dec 01; 21(6):575-582. PubMed ID: 34909475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Infiltration anesthesia for extraction of the mandibular molars.
    El-Kholey KE.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct 01; 71(10):1658.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24040947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.