These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
383 related items for PubMed ID: 21197492
1. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques. Del Acqua MA, Chavez AM, Castanharo SM, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Feb; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of four transfer impression techniques for dental implants: a scanning electron microscopic analysis. Yamamoto E, Marotti J, de Campos TT, Neto PT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Feb; 25(6):1115-24. PubMed ID: 21197487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. Filho HG, Mazaro JV, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG, dos Santos PH. J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques. de Avila ED, de Matos Moraes F, Castanharo SM, Del'Acqua MA, de Assis Mollo F. J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials. Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Dec; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings. Dumbrigue HB, Gurun DC, Javid NS. J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants. Marder MZ, Marder RW. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han CH, Lee KW. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Oct; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Making an implant-level impression using solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a clinical report. Selecman AM, Wicks RA. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19231566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Indications and techniques for surgical indexing at stage I implant surgery. Montrose J. Dent Today; 2004 Jul; 23(7):106-9; quiz 109. PubMed ID: 15354659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]