These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 21209155

  • 1. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.
    Wang Z, Zhou XH, Wang M.
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):567-81. PubMed ID: 21209155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an imperfect gold standard.
    Sun J, Tang C, Xie W, Zhou XH.
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul 01; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 38994641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS.
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb 28; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C, van Belle G, Miller JP, Morris JC.
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr 15; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Linden A.
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr 15; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.
    Obuchowski NA.
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun 15; 53(2):567-78. PubMed ID: 9192452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH.
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar 15; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C, van Belle G, Miller JP, Yan Y, Gao F, Yu K, Morris JC.
    Biom J; 2007 Aug 15; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.
    Zheng Y, Barlow WE, Cutter G.
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar 15; 61(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 15737102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bootstrap-based procedures for inference in nonparametric receiver-operating characteristic curve regression analysis.
    Rodríguez-Álvarez MX, Roca-Pardiñas J, Cadarso-Suárez C, Tahoces PG.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar 15; 27(3):740-764. PubMed ID: 29233083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Novel "Maximizing Kappa" Approach for Assessing the Ability of a Diagnostic Marker and Its Optimal Cutoff Value.
    Chang CH, Yang JT, Lee MH.
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015 Mar 15; 25(5):1005-19. PubMed ID: 24918528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. ROC curve regression analysis: the use of ordinal regression models for diagnostic test assessment.
    Tosteson AN, Weinstein MC, Wittenberg J, Begg CB.
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov 15; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):73-8. PubMed ID: 7851336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
    Tsimikas JV, Bosch RJ, Coull BA, El Barmi H.
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec 15; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.