These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

139 related items for PubMed ID: 21218893

  • 1. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release.
    Pierzycki RH, Seeber BU.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3614-24. PubMed ID: 21218893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.
    Apoux F, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2075-84. PubMed ID: 20968378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
    Jackson HM, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM, Summerfield AQ, Kitterick PT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comodulation masking release as a function of level.
    Moore BC, Shailer MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):829-35. PubMed ID: 1939887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M, Dietz M, Hohmann V.
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F, Yoho SE, Youngdahl CL, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
    Qi B, Mao Y, Liu J, Liu B, Xu L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S, Luo X, Krishnan A.
    Ear Hear; 2017 May; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.
    Rocchi F, Dylla ME, Bohlen PA, Ramachandran R.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():1-12. PubMed ID: 27770624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release.
    Goldman SA, Baer T, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3181-93. PubMed ID: 21568420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Modeling within- and across-channel processes in comodulation masking release.
    Dau T, Piechowiak T, Ewert SD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):350-64. PubMed ID: 23297908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comodulation masking release in electric hearing.
    Pierzycki RH, Seeber BU.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 24414194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D, Jourdes V, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder.
    Seeber BU, Hafter ER.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1509-21. PubMed ID: 21428515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.
    Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4446. PubMed ID: 25669256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Perception of noise-vocoded tone complexes: A time domain analysis based on an auditory filterbank model.
    Shofner WP, Morris H, Mills M.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():1-16. PubMed ID: 30005269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K, Moore BC, Stone MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.