These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 2122664

  • 1. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE, Yagan R, Oravec D, Shah Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
    Kimme-Smith C, Rothschild PA, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Moler C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.
    Schmidt RA, Doi K, Sekiya M, Xu XW, Giger ML, Lu CT, Mojtahedi S, MacMahon H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Chow S.
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 1987598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD, Tsalafoutas IA, Georgiou EK, Yakoumakis EN.
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
    Wojtasek DA, Teixidor HS, Govoni AF, Gareen IF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerations.
    Tabar L, Haus AG.
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 2781032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
    Chang CH, Sibala JL, Martin NL, Riley RC.
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Börjesson S, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, Månsson LG, Medin J, Wanninger F, Panzer W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Oct; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
    Tsalafoutas OA, Kolovos CA, Tsapaki V, Betsou S, Koliakou E, Maniatis PN, Xenofos S.
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.
    Schueler BA, Gray JE, Gisvold JJ.
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 1509043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
    Brink C, de Villiers JF, Lötter MG, van Zyl M.
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L, Day JL, Villafana T, Miller CH, Lightfoot DA.
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ, Boyd MM, al Yousef K.
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.