These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1349 related items for PubMed ID: 21229915

  • 1. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
    Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Gröndahl K.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
    Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD.
    Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Gröndahl K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Feb; 37(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 18239034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
    Kamburoğlu K, Kursun S.
    Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
    Elsaltani MH, Farid MM, Eldin Ashmawy MS.
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.
    Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, Nakajima K, Okano T.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology.
    Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 17178504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999 Jul; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
    Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, Seki K, Araki K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of cone beam CT device and field of view for the detection of simulated periapical bone lesions.
    Hedesiu M, Baciut M, Baciut G, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, SEDENTEXCT Consortium.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Oct; 41(7):548-52. PubMed ID: 22554990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
    Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, Souza PC, Martens W, Shahbazian M, Alonso A, Lambrichts I.
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A novel method to estimate the volume of bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Esposito SA, Huybrechts B, Slagmolen P, Cotti E, Coucke W, Pauwels R, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R.
    J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1111-5. PubMed ID: 23953281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of limited-volume cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of periapical bone loss: 360° scans versus 180° scans.
    Lennon S, Patel S, Foschi F, Wilson R, Davies J, Mannocci F.
    Int Endod J; 2011 Dec; 44(12):1118-27. PubMed ID: 21895701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
    Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW.
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Endodontics in motion: new concepts, materials and techniques 2. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning].
    Özok AR, Metska ME.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2015 Sep; 122(9):465-72. PubMed ID: 26397106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM.
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May 15; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
    Pauwels R, Zhang G, Theodorakou C, Walker A, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K, SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium.
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct 15; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 68.