These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

271 related items for PubMed ID: 21235007

  • 1. Allometric and metameric shape variation in Pan mandibular molars: a digital morphometric analysis.
    Singleton M, Rosenberger AL, Robinson C, O'neill R.
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Feb; 294(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 21235007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular shape diversity in Pan.
    Robinson C.
    J Hum Evol; 2012 Jul; 63(1):191-204. PubMed ID: 22682959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Discrimination of extant Pan species and subspecies using the enamel-dentine junction morphology of lower molars.
    Skinner MM, Gunz P, Wood BA, Boesch C, Hublin JJ.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19382140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Does space in the jaw influence the timing of molar crown initiation? A model using baboons (Papio anubis) and great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus).
    Boughner JC, Dean MC.
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Mar; 46(3):255-77. PubMed ID: 14984783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Berge C, Penin X.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Identifying metameric variation in extant hominoid and fossil hominid mandibular molars.
    Hlusko LJ.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 May; 118(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 11953948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Lieberman DE, Carlo J, Ponce de León M, Zollikofer CP.
    J Hum Evol; 2007 Jun; 52(6):647-62. PubMed ID: 17298840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Geometric morphometric analysis of allometric variation in the mandibular morphology of the hominids of Atapuerca, Sima de los Huesos site.
    Rosas A, Bastir M.
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2004 Jun; 278(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 15164343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Permanent tooth mineralization in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (P. troglodytes).
    Boughner JC, Dean MC, Wilgenbusch CS.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Dec; 149(4):560-71. PubMed ID: 23097136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ontogenetic study of allometric variation in Homo and Pan mandibles.
    Singh N.
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2014 Feb; 297(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 24347386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. How many landmarks? Assessing the classification accuracy of Pan lower molars using a geometric morphometric analysis of the occlusal basin as seen at the enamel-dentine junction.
    Skinner MM, Gunz P, Wood BA, Hublin JJ.
    Front Oral Biol; 2009 Feb; 13():23-29. PubMed ID: 19828964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Penin X, Berge C, Baylac M.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 May; 118(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 11953945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The enamel-dentine junction in the postcanine dentition of Australopithecus africanus: intra-individual metameric and antimeric variation.
    Braga J, Thackeray JF, Subsol G, Kahn JL, Maret D, Treil J, Beck A.
    J Anat; 2010 Jan; 216(1):62-79. PubMed ID: 19900182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Size and shape dimorphism in great ape mandibles and implications for fossil species recognition.
    Taylor AB.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Jan; 129(1):82-98. PubMed ID: 16161147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes.
    Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bookstein FL.
    Evol Dev; 2005 Jan; 7(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 15876197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantifying mental foramen position in extant hominoids and Australopithecus: implications for its use in studies of human evolution.
    Robinson CA, Williams FL.
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2010 Aug; 293(8):1337-49. PubMed ID: 20564583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The allometry of relative cusp size in hominoid mandibular molars.
    Hills M, Graham SH, Wood BA.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 Nov; 62(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 6419619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ontogenetic insights into the significance of mandibular corpus shape variation in hominoids: Developmental covariation between M2 crypt formation and corpus shape.
    Pitirri MK, Begun D.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Jan; 171(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 31710703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The presence of accessory cusps in chimpanzee lower molars is consistent with a patterning cascade model of development.
    Skinner MM, Gunz P.
    J Anat; 2010 Sep; 217(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 20629983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Population systematics of chimpanzees using molar morphometrics.
    Pilbrow V.
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Dec; 51(6):646-62. PubMed ID: 16965803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.