These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

191 related items for PubMed ID: 21236516

  • 1. Sensitivity and specificity of the user-seal-check in determining the fit of N95 respirators.
    Lam SC, Lee JK, Yau SY, Charm CY.
    J Hosp Infect; 2011 Mar; 77(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 21236516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the user seal check on gross leakage detection of 3 different designs of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Lam SC, Lui AK, Lee LY, Lee JK, Wong KF, Lee CN.
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 May 01; 44(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 26831273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Health care workers and respiratory protection: is the user seal check a surrogate for respirator fit-testing?
    Danyluk Q, Hon CY, Neudorf M, Yassi A, Bryce E, Janssen B, Astrakianakis G.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 May 01; 8(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 21462067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Subject validation of reusable N95 stop-gap filtering facepiece respirators in COVID-19 pandemic.
    Ng WCK, Mbadjeu Hondjeu AR, Syrett A, Caragata R, Rozenberg D, Xiao Z, Anwari V, Trac J, Mashari A.
    PLoS One; 2020 May 01; 15(11):e0242304. PubMed ID: 33186406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fit Characteristics of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators and the Accuracy of the User Seal Check among Koreans.
    Huh YJ, Jeong HM, Lim J, Park HY, Kim MY, Oh HS, Huh K.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Jan 01; 39(1):104-107. PubMed ID: 29345612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
    Hon CY, Danyluk Q, Bryce E, Janssen B, Neudorf M, Yassi A, Shen H, Astrakianakis G.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar 01; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the benefit of the user seal check on N95 filtering facepiece respirator fit.
    Viscusi DJ, Bergman MS, Zhuang Z, Shaffer RE.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012 Mar 01; 9(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 22606976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Determination of known exhalation valve damage using a negative pressure user seal check method on full facepiece respirators.
    Delaney LJ, McKay RT, Freeman A.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Apr 01; 18(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 12637234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Does training in performing a fit check enhance N95 respirator efficacy?
    Or P, Chung J, Wong T.
    Workplace Health Saf; 2012 Dec 01; 60(12):511-5. PubMed ID: 23210700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.
    Williams DL, Kave B, Begg F, Bodas C, Ng I.
    Infect Dis Health; 2022 May 01; 27(2):61-65. PubMed ID: 34799300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reliability of N95 respirators for respiratory protection before, during, and after nursing procedures.
    Suen LKP, Yang L, Ho SSK, Fung KHK, Boost MV, Wu CST, Au-Yeung CH, O'Donoghue M.
    Am J Infect Control; 2017 Sep 01; 45(9):974-978. PubMed ID: 28526306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prediction of N95 Respirator Fit from Fogging of Eyeglasses: A Pilot Study.
    Kyaw S, Johns M, Lim R, Stewart WC, Rojas N, Thambiraj SR, Shehabi Y, Arora S.
    Indian J Crit Care Med; 2021 Sep 01; 25(9):976-980. PubMed ID: 34963713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC, Lawrence RB, Campbell DL, Zhuang Z, Calvert CA, Jensen PA.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr 01; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparing mask fit and usability of traditional and nanofibre N95 filtering facepiece respirators before and after nursing procedures.
    Suen LKP, Guo YP, Ho SSK, Au-Yeung CH, Lam SC.
    J Hosp Infect; 2020 Mar 01; 104(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 31545991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The adequacy of user seal checking for N95 respirators compared to formal fit testing: A multicentred observational study.
    Cass HG, Hanlon GC, McKenzie DP, Harley NS, Kelly DN, Barrett JA.
    Aust Crit Care; 2023 Sep 01; 36(5):787-792. PubMed ID: 36244917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB, Duling MG, Calvert CA, Coffey CC.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep 01; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Janssen L, Luinenburg MD, Mullins HE, Danisch SG, Nelson TJ.
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003 Sep 01; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Respiratory protection by respirators: the predictive value of user seal check for the fit determination in healthcare settings.
    Lam SC, Lee JK, Lee LY, Wong KF, Lee CN.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Apr 01; 32(4):402-3. PubMed ID: 21460496
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Study on the relationship between the fitness of three types of N95 respirators and facial dimensions.
    Wang G, Luo C, Cui C, Huang J.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 May 01; 21(5):319-325. PubMed ID: 38416473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. COVID-19 global pandemic planning: Performance and electret charge of N95 respirators after recommended decontamination methods.
    Grillet AM, Nemer MB, Storch S, Sanchez AL, Piekos ES, Leonard J, Hurwitz I, Perkins DJ.
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2021 Mar 01; 246(6):740-748. PubMed ID: 33325749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.