These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

400 related items for PubMed ID: 21239692

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
    Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA.
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 21239692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Tsai AG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP, Laprade RF.
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 19966094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: an in vitro study.
    Goldsmith MT, Jansson KS, Smith SD, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF, Wijdicks CA.
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1595-604. PubMed ID: 23696212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.
    Zantop T, Diermann N, Schumacher T, Schanz S, Fu FH, Petersen W.
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 18296542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Driscoll MD, Isabell GP, Conditt MA, Ismaily SK, Jupiter DC, Noble PC, Lowe WR.
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1481-9. PubMed ID: 22796141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Knee laxity control in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation.
    Colombet P.
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 21335352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science.
    Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S.
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Aug; 39(8):1789-99. PubMed ID: 21596902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament.
    Brophy RH, Voos JE, Shannon FJ, Granchi CC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Pearle AD.
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2196-203. PubMed ID: 18669985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.
    Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR.
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 20348284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of anterior cruciate ligament bundles on knee kinematics: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation.
    Robinson J, Carrat L, Granchi C, Colombet P.
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2006-13. PubMed ID: 17954928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 2: Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Nitri M, Rasmussen MT, Williams BT, Moulton SG, Cruz RS, Dornan GJ, Goldsmith MT, LaPrade RF.
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Mar; 44(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 26831632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo kinematic analysis.
    Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Signorelli C, Lopomo N, Grassi A, Bonanzinga T, Nitri M, Marcacci M.
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Mar; 42(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 24519185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.
    Bedi A, Musahl V, O'Loughlin P, Maak T, Citak M, Dixon P, Pearle AD.
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 38(9):1788-94. PubMed ID: 20566720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical comparisons between 4-strand and modified Larson 2-strand procedures for reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee.
    Miyatake S, Kondo E, Tsai TY, Hirschmann M, Halewood C, Jakobsen BW, Yasuda K, Amis AA.
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1462-9. PubMed ID: 21508435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of graft fixation angles on anteroposterior and rotational knee laxity in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation using computerized navigation.
    Koga H, Muneta T, Yagishita K, Ju YJ, Sekiya I.
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 40(3):615-23. PubMed ID: 22109546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.