These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 21248386

  • 1. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW, Mackenzie A, Honey ID.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb 21; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 07; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Characterization of the effects of the FineView algorithm for full field digital mammography.
    Urbanczyk H, McDonagh E, Marshall NW, Castellano I.
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr 07; 57(7):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 22429938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.
    Monnin P, Marshall NW, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 56(14):4221-38. PubMed ID: 21701050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
    Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, Tassoni D.
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul 21; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC, Clemens JC, Hemmer C, Morel C.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar 21; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L, Pannella A, Bassetti C, Fantinato D, Baldi M, Bertoli G.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Mar 21; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D, Liu H, Wu X.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 21; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Sep 21; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.