These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 2125336

  • 21. Body Composition and Physical Fitness Tests Among US Army Soldiers: A Comparison of the Active and Reserve Components.
    Russell DW, Kazman J, Russell CA.
    Public Health Rep; 2019; 134(5):502-513. PubMed ID: 31394052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cost effectiveness of two army physical fitness programs.
    Talbot LA, Metter EJ, Fleg JL, Weinstein AA, Frick KD.
    Mil Med; 2013 Dec; 178(12):1353-7. PubMed ID: 24306019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Baseline Physical Activity Behaviors and Relationships with Fitness in the Army Training at High Intensity Study.
    Heinrich KM, Streetman AE, Kukić F, Fong C, Hollerbach BS, Goodman BD, Haddock CK, Poston WSC.
    J Funct Morphol Kinesiol; 2022 Mar 08; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 35323610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Physical fitness and depressive symptoms during army basic combat training.
    Crowley SK, Wilkinson LL, Wigfall LT, Reynolds AM, Muraca ST, Glover SH, Wooten NR, Sui X, Beets MW, Durstine JL, Newman-Norlund RD, Youngstedt SD.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan 08; 47(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 24870581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Physical fitness profile of Army ROTC cadets.
    Thomas DQ, Lumpp SA, Schreiber JA, Keith JA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov 08; 18(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 15574107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) Scores and Demographics of US Army Pre-Ranger Candidates.
    Davis JD, Orr R, Knapik JJ, Harris D.
    Mil Med; 2020 Jun 08; 185(5-6):e788-e794. PubMed ID: 31819968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. How do they compare?: an assessment of predeployment fitness in the Arizona National Guard.
    Warr BJ, Alvar BA, Dodd DJ, Heumann KJ, Mitros MR, Keating CJ, Swan PD.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Nov 08; 25(11):2955-62. PubMed ID: 21969079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of an Experimental vs. Traditional Military Training Program on 2-Mile Run Performance During the Army Physical Fitness Test.
    Stone BL, Heishman AD, Campbell JA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Dec 08; 34(12):3431-3438. PubMed ID: 33235017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers.
    Foulis SA, Sharp MA, Redmond JE, Frykman PN, Warr BJ, Gebhardt DL, Baker TA, Canino MC, Zambraski EJ.
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov 08; 20 Suppl 4():S74-S78. PubMed ID: 28823473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Navy recruits: fitness measuring, validation, and norming.
    Sekulic D, Males B, Miletic D.
    Mil Med; 2006 Aug 08; 171(8):749-52. PubMed ID: 16933816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.