These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

564 related items for PubMed ID: 21272972

  • 1. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
    Agarwal M, Mohammad S, Singh RK, Singh V.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
    Gupta A, Singh V, Mohammad S.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    Singh V, Kumar I, Bhagol A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of a single noncompression miniplate versus 2 noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Danda AK.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1565-7. PubMed ID: 20430504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I maxillary fracture plating techniques.
    Wang H, Chen MS, Fan YB, Tang W, Tian WD.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17517293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Surgical treatment of sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle using long-screw osteosynthesis.
    Luo S, Li B, Long X, Deng M, Cai H, Cheng Y.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1988-94. PubMed ID: 21292375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Locking Miniplate Osteosynthesis of Anterior Mandibular Fractures-Quo Vadis?
    Desai V, Jain MK.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1041.e1-1041.e9. PubMed ID: 30796907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.
    Gamit M, Patel Y, Sood R, Vadera H, Savjani K, Bhatti Z.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 37740128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Small and large titanium plates are equally effective for treating mandible fractures.
    Bouloux GF, Chen S, Threadgill JM.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 22698293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
    Sehgal S, Ramanujam L, Prasad K, Krishnappa R.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A prospective trial of poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid co-polymer plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Ferretti C.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 37(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 18295449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?
    Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Yerit K, Voracek M, Turhani D, Watzinger F, Enislidis G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 16545702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of surgical treatment in mandibular condyle fractures.
    Vesnaver A, Ahčan U, Rozman J.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):647-53. PubMed ID: 22079126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Locking v/s non-locking reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction.
    Harjani B, Singh RK, Pal US, Singh G.
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 3(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 23833491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of material-related complications after bilateral sagittal split mandibular setback surgery: biodegradable versus titanium miniplates.
    Yoshioka I, Igawa K, Nagata J, Yoshida M, Ogawa Y, Ichiki T, Yokota R, Takamori K, Kashima K, Sakoda S.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):919-24. PubMed ID: 21757275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
    Zix J, Lieger O, Iizuka T.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1758-63. PubMed ID: 17719394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Can an arch bar replace a second lag screw in management of anterior mandibular fractures?
    Emam HA, Stevens MR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 22079063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study.
    Siddiqui A, Markose G, Moos KF, McMahon J, Ayoub AF.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 45(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 17110006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and conventional locking miniplates.
    Kinra PK, Jayakumar K, Soumithran CS, Michael MJ, Passi D, Singh M.
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 8(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 28761274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures - linea obliqua plate versus grid plate.
    Höfer SH, Ha L, Ballon A, Sader R, Landes C.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):807-11. PubMed ID: 22483950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.