These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ, Gu BX, Chen YC, Wang W, Chen SW, Hu DJ. Neurology; 2011 Aug 16; 77(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 21775735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience. Mönninghoff C, Maderwald S, Theysohn JM, Kraff O, Ladd SC, Ladd ME, Forsting M, Quick HH, Wanke I. Rofo; 2009 Jan 16; 181(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19115164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Ferré JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, Carsin M, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Gauvrit JY, Desal HA. Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec 16; 72(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 18809272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Depiction of branch vessels arising from intracranial aneurysm sacs: Time-of-flight MR angiography versus CT angiography. Goto M, Kunimatsu A, Shojima M, Mori H, Abe O, Aoki S, Hayashi N, Gonoi W, Miyati T, Ino K, Yano K, Saito N, Ohtomo K. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Nov 16; 126():177-84. PubMed ID: 25270230 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries]. Carriero A, Gatta S, Baratto M, Marano R, Aulisa R, Bonomo L. Radiol Med; 1998 Mar 16; 95(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 9638159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography. Schneider G, Ballarati C, Grazioli L, Manfredi R, Thurnher S, Kroencke TJ, Taupitz M, Merlino B, Bonomo L, Shen N, Pirovano G, Kirchin MA, Spinazzi A. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct 16; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, Hellmich M, Nijenhuis M, Lackner K, Gossmann A. Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep 16; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, Strada L, Righi C, Politi LS, Kirchin MA, Chiesa R, Scotti G. Radiology; 2005 Jul 16; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography. Villablanca JP, Nael K, Habibi R, Nael A, Laub G, Finn JP. Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov 16; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Shahzad R, Younas F. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jun 16; 21(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 21711985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis. Wehrschuetz M, Aschauer M, Portugaller H, Stix A, Wehrschuetz-Sigl E, Hausegger K, Ebner F. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004 Jun 16; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial. Bui BT, Miller S, Mildenberger P, Sam A, Sheng R, Omniscan MRA Investigator Panel. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun 16; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine. Anzidei M, Napoli A, Marincola BC, Kirchin MA, Neira C, Geiger D, Zaccagna F, Catalano C, Passariello R. Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec 16; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow up of coiled intracranial aneurysms with standard resolution and higher resolution magnetic resonance angiography. Dupre S, Coulthard A. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb 16; 52(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18373828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms. Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Yamashita M, Nagatomi H, Hata H, Saginoya T, Sagara Y, Mori H. Stroke; 2002 Jul 16; 33(7):1803-8. PubMed ID: 12105357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, Mali WP. Radiology; 2003 Sep 16; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]