These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 21285878

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
    D'Onofrio KL, Gifford RH, Ricketts TA.
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun 10; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun 10; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F, Lau CC, Korhonen P, Crose B.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar 10; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss.
    Brennan MA, McCreery R, Kopun J, Hoover B, Alexander J, Lewis D, Stelmachowicz PG.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Mar 10; 25(10):983-98. PubMed ID: 25514451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA, Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec 10; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and fluctuating background sounds.
    Stone MA, Moore BC, Wojtczak M, Gudgin E.
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug 10; 31(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 9307821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.
    Moore BC, Sęk A.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep 07; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid.
    Moore BC, Stainsby TH, Alcántara JI, Kühnel V.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Sep 07; 43(7):399-409. PubMed ID: 15515639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.