These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 2128850

  • 21. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Dec; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Assessment of microleakage of cervical restorations.
    Chan CC, Lin TH, Chan KW, Chung KH.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1991 May; 47(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 1649671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D, Pines MS, Erakin C, Fuerst PF.
    J Clin Dent; 1999 May; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimensions of three dentinal bonding systems.
    Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):289-94. PubMed ID: 2128913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin.
    Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU, Lim CC, Neo JC.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Nov; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. In vitro microleakage of glass-ionomer composite resin hybrid materials.
    Rodrigues JA, De Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Feb; 24(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10483445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of new bonding systems on microleakage.
    Swift EJ, Hansen SE.
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 2513841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth.
    Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH, Puckett AD.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Oct; 20(6):230-5. PubMed ID: 8710704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Coronal microleakage of permanent lingual access restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth.
    Wilcox LR, Diaz-Arnold A.
    J Endod; 1989 Dec; 15(12):584-7. PubMed ID: 2561747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Prepolymerization of Gluma 4 sealer: effect on bonding.
    Crim GA.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Feb; 3(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 2115787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Williams CE.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994 Dec; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. An in vitro study of the effectiveness of bonding agents in preventing microleakage in composite restorations of erosion and abrasion lesions.
    Mangum FI, Berry EA.
    Gen Dent; 1989 Dec; 37(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 2689267
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.