These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

113 related items for PubMed ID: 21299180

  • 1. Economic evaluation of computed radiography comparing to film method in quality control of general X-ray machine at Phramongkutklao Hospital.
    Saengruang-Orn S, Vimolket T, Mongkolsuk M, Lertmaharit S, Tanapat Y, Noola B, Thungsiri K, Kamolratanakul P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S74-83. PubMed ID: 21299180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A quality control program for cine radiography.
    Renaud L, Morissette R.
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 6526849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C, Gorman D, Byrne P, Larkin A, Dowling A, Malone JF.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Dec; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Results of a program of quality control in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S, Catolla Cavalcanti R, Gallini R, Giugni U.
    Radiol Med; 1983 Apr; 69(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 6856887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Image quality of paper prints compared to film copies in CT investigations].
    Bley T, Burger D, Ghanem N, Thürl C, Saueressig U, Kotter E, Langer M.
    Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 11960403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Quality control during processing of film in x-ray establishments].
    Hoberg B.
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jul; 41(7):248-52. PubMed ID: 3413585
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Suggested baseline ranges for performance testing of the Fujifilm FCR Capsula XL computed radiography system.
    Thiele DL, Schick DK, Barr S.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Dec; 33(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 21286892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Complex evaluation of film mammography imaging systems. I. Methodological principles].
    Friedrich M, Weskamp P.
    Rofo; 1984 May; 140(5):585-96. PubMed ID: 6429765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M, Adliene D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Quality control of X-ray screen-film sets in light of introduction of an international system of standards].
    Gorelik FG.
    Med Tekh; 2002 May; (5):16-8. PubMed ID: 12512276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH, Alders B.
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing.
    Horner K.
    Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computed tomography: the most important advancement in radiography since the discovery of x-rays.
    Stanley JH.
    Stand News; 1995 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10160504
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.