These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

113 related items for PubMed ID: 21299180

  • 21. Regular processor control improves portal film quality.
    Kihlén B.
    Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1557499
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Radiographic and fluoroscopic QC.
    Schubert R.
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(3):197-8. PubMed ID: 7708922
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The practical use of test films for x-ray film processor quality control.
    Rowley RV.
    Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1985 Aug; 16(3):123-5. PubMed ID: 10272616
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
    Gadeholt G, Geitung JT, Göthlin JH, Asp T.
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Electronic versus film imaging: cost and quality considerations.
    Vizy KN.
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Aug; 8(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10279921
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Quality control in computed tomography].
    Rockstroh G, Lieberenz S, Straubel U.
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989 Aug; 30(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2798824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
    Gorelik FG.
    Med Tekh; 2000 Aug; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W, Giacomuzzi SM, Springer P.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Troubleshooting artifacts.
    Peart O.
    Radiol Technol; 2002 Nov; 73(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 11928168
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The 35 X 42.5 cm (14 X 17 inch) chest film: 7.5 cm too long.
    Bruwer A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):632-3. PubMed ID: 6974490
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G, Brambilla MG, De Crescenzo S.
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.