These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


322 related items for PubMed ID: 2132018

  • 21. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
    Emanuel EJ.
    Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reconciling autonomy and the value of life.
    Bopp J.
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):600-2. PubMed ID: 2332579
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Cruzan and caring for others.
    Lynn J, Glover J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990 May; 20(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 2228576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The insane root takes reason prisoner: the supreme court and the right to die.
    Annas GJ.
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993 May; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 8453236
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The Cruzan case.
    Rouse F.
    Lancet; 1991 Jan 12; 337(8733):105-6. PubMed ID: 1670690
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Surrogate decisions at risk. The Cruzan case.
    Thomasma DC.
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May 12; 38(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 2110204
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
    Karbal W.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug 12; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan.
    Orentlicher D.
    JAMA; 1990 Nov 14; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cruzan: clear and convincing? Missouri stands alone.
    Colby WH.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990 Nov 14; 20(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2121666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Cruzan decision and medical practice.
    Thomasma DC.
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 May 14; 151(5):853-4. PubMed ID: 2025130
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy.
    Kamisar Y.
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun 14; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The role of the clear and convincing standard of proof in right to die cases.
    Forte DF.
    Issues Law Med; 1992 Jun 14; 8(2):183-203. PubMed ID: 1399495
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.