These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

351 related items for PubMed ID: 21324143

  • 1. Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial).
    Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, Alhafidh AH, Hakvoort RA, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMC Womens Health; 2011 Feb 15; 11():4. PubMed ID: 21324143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN, Coolen AL, Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Bongers M, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Deprest J, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep 17; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ, Kreuwel IA, Dijkstra JR, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb 17; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
    BMJ; 2019 Sep 10; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMJ; 2015 Jul 23; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
    Coolen AWM, van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden AMJ, Veen J, van Eijndhoven HWF, Mol BWJ, Roovers JP, Bongers MY.
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul 26; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD, Chen YS, Yi XF, Ding JX, Feng WW, Yao LQ, Huang J, Zhang Y, Hu WG, Zhu ZL, Hua KQ.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb 26; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. McCall Culdoplasty vs. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation after vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function in postmenopausal women.
    Kokanalı MK, Cavkaytar S, Aksakal O, Doğanay M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov 26; 194():218-22. PubMed ID: 26448134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    JAMA; 2018 Apr 17; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Svabik K, Martan A, Masata J, El-Haddad R, Hubka P.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr 17; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for massive genital prolapse in women aged over 80 years.
    Nieminen K, Heinonen PK.
    BJOG; 2001 Aug 17; 108(8):817-21. PubMed ID: 11510706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.
    Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Pruszynski JE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug 17; 231(2):263.e1-263.e10. PubMed ID: 38710269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function.
    Okcu NT, Gürbüz T, Uysal G.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr 17; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.