These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


721 related items for PubMed ID: 21324148

  • 1. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J, Akhtar-Danesh N, Dolovich L, Thabane L, CHAT investigators.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb 16; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J, Raina P, Beyene J, Thabane L.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan 23; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).
    Ma J, Thabane L, Kaczorowski J, Chambers L, Dolovich L, Karwalajtys T, Levitt C.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun 16; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
    Turner EL, Yao L, Li F, Prague M.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May 16; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
    Sullivan TR, Salter AB, Ryan P, Lee KJ.
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep 15; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.
    Gomes M, Díaz-Ordaz K, Grieve R, Kenward MG.
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov 15; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N.
    Biom J; 2008 Jun 15; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of imputation strategies in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes.
    Caille A, Leyrat C, Giraudeau B.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec 15; 25(6):2650-2669. PubMed ID: 24713160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
    Hossain A, DiazOrdaz K, Bartlett JW.
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug 30; 36(19):3092-3109. PubMed ID: 28557022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Using Multiple Imputation with GEE with Non-monotone Missing Longitudinal Binary Outcomes.
    Lipsitz SR, Fitzmaurice GM, Weiss RD.
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec 30; 85(4):890-904. PubMed ID: 33006740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
    Mukaka M, White SA, Terlouw DJ, Mwapasa V, Kalilani-Phiri L, Faragher EB.
    Trials; 2016 Jul 22; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM.
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb 22; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.