These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
275 related items for PubMed ID: 21324762
21. Comparison of reflux frequency during prolonged multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring on and off acid suppression therapy. Blonski W, Vela MF, Castell DO. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 43(9):816-20. PubMed ID: 19398927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Laboratory based investigations for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dolder M, Tutuian R. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):787-98. PubMed ID: 21126694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical importance of impedance measurements. Agrawal A, Castell DO. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Dec; 42(5):579-83. PubMed ID: 18364586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects. Grigolon A, Cantú P, Bravi I, Caparello C, Penagini R. Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Wireless 'mini' multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH: what is the optimal design of a miniature wireless device? Heard R, Sharma N, Roberts J, Castell D, Pohl D. Dis Esophagus; 2014 Jul; 27(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 22978791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations? Maerten P, Ortner M, Michetti P, Dorta G. Digestion; 2007 Jul; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux. Hila A, Agrawal A, Castell DO. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Feb; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 17296528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Technology insight: The role of impedance testing for esophageal disorders. Sifrim D, Blondeau K. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Apr; 3(4):210-9. PubMed ID: 16582963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)]. Mönkemüller K, Neumann H, Fry LC, Kolfenbach S, Malfertheiner P. Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Acid and nonacid reflux monitoring. Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE. Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2014 Mar; 43(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 24503361 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. New technologies to evaluate esophageal function. Ravi K, Francis DL. Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Nov; 4(6):829-37. PubMed ID: 18035949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring. Bansal A, Wani S, Rastogi A, Rastogi K, Goyal A, Hall S, Singh V, Higbee A, Sharma P. Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproducibility of multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring of gastroesophageal reflux. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ. Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Feb; 100(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 15667480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dughera L, Navino M, Cassolino P, Pellicano R. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2007 Jun; 53(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 17557042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]