These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 21327799

  • 1. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
    Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent.
    Behr M, Hansmann M, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 19225814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T, Abe T, Ito Y, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Watson TF, Foxton RM.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Dec; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S, Anthofer T, Fritzsch M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Federlin M.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Dec; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E, Celik EU, Turkun M.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Dec; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG, González-Lopez S, Bolaños-Carmona V, Maurício PJ, Félix SA, Carvalho PA.
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Oct; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of inlay ceramic systems luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Uludag B, Yucedag E, Sahin V.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 25264550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, Roggendorf MJ.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
    Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, Hellwig E.
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sealing effectiveness of etch-and-rinse vs self-etching adhesives after water aging: influence of acid etching and NaOCl dentin pretreatment.
    Monticelli F, Toledano M, Silva AS, Osorio E, Osorio R.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Jun; 10(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18652266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M, El-Mowafy O, Tam L, Fenton A.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jun; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of surface treatment on fatigue behaviour between Tetric Ceram inlays and Variolink luting composite.
    Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Baresel J, Trapper T, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Dec; 5(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 11800440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S, de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.
    Bortolotto T, Doudou W, Kunzelmann KH, Krejci I.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 22015462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling.
    Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11572295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
    Rodrigues Junior SA, Pin LF, Machado G, Della Bona A, Demarco FF.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.