These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
193 related items for PubMed ID: 21329921
1. Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures. Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, De Vries MR, Van der Elst M. Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1125-9. PubMed ID: 21329921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant Failure Rates and Cost Analysis of Contoured Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures. Moss LK, Kim-Orden MH, Ravinsky R, Hoshino CM, Zinar DM, Gold SM. Orthopedics; 2017 Nov 01; 40(6):e1024-e1029. PubMed ID: 29058759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of complication rates between locking and non-locking plates in distal fibular fractures. Moriarity A, Ellanti P, Mohan K, Fhoghlu CN, Fenelon C, McKenna J. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Jun 01; 104(4):503-506. PubMed ID: 29581071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures. Lyle SA, Malik C, Oddy MJ. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Jun 01; 57(4):664-667. PubMed ID: 29681437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tubular vs Profile Plate in Peroneal or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Skin Complication? A Retrospective Study in Three Level I Trauma Center. Petruccelli R, Bisaccia M, Rinonapoli G, Rollo G, Meccariello L, Falzarano G, Ceccarini P, Bisaccia O, Giaracuni M, Caraffa A. Med Arch; 2017 Aug 01; 71(4):265-269. PubMed ID: 28974847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of bone union and complication rates between locking and non-locking plates in distal fibular fracture: Retrospective study of 106 cases. El Fatayri B, Bulaïd Y, Djebara AE, Havet E, Mertl P, Dehl M. Injury; 2019 Dec 01; 50(12):2324-2331. PubMed ID: 31635907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does fibular plating improve alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures? Egol KA, Weisz R, Hiebert R, Tejwani NC, Koval KJ, Sanders RW. J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb 01; 20(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 16462561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: A biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates. Kim T, Ayturk UM, Haskell A, Miclau T, Puttlitz CM. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007 Feb 01; 46(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17198946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of two minimally invasive internal fixed methods for the treatment of distal tibio-fibula fractures]. Feng YZ, Hong JJ, Peng L, Shui XL, Tang J, Chen LW, Guo XS. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb 01; 49(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 21426824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical treatment of midclavicular fractures in the elderly: a comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. Pai HT, Lee YS, Cheng CY. Orthopedics; 2009 Apr 01; 32(4):. PubMed ID: 19388617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation for Distal Fibula Fractures in Trimalleolar Ankle Injuries. Nguyentat A, Camisa W, Patel S, Lagaay P. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Apr 01; 55(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 26497086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fibular Plate Fixation and Correlated Short-term Complications. Bäcker HC, Greisberg JK, Vosseller JT. Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Oct 01; 13(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 31538819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of lateral locking plate and antiglide plate for fixation of distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study. Minihane KP, Lee C, Ahn C, Zhang LQ, Merk BR. J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep 01; 20(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 16990728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate]. Krbec M, Motycka J, Lunácek L, Dousa P. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Dec 01; 76(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 20067694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the Use of Locking Screws Decrease the Rate of Hardware Removal in Ankle Fractures? Walley KC, Gonzalez TA, Nandyala SV, Macauley A, Elnabawi Y, Rodriguez EK, Appleton PT. Foot Ankle Spec; 2019 Dec 01; 12(6):518-521. PubMed ID: 30607989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures. Eckel TT, Glisson RR, Anand P, Parekh SG. Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Nov 01; 34(11):1588-95. PubMed ID: 23818460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study. Singh V, Kumar I, Bhagol A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr 01; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study. Herrera-Pérez M, Gutiérrez-Morales MJ, Guerra-Ferraz A, Pais-Brito JL, Boluda-Mengod J, Garcés GL. Injury; 2017 Nov 01; 48 Suppl 6():S60-S65. PubMed ID: 29162244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost analysis and clinical outcomes of anatomic pre-contoured locking versus conventional plates for distal fibula ankle fractures. Patel R, McCarthy K, Christensen J, Jacobs B, Karsch J, Sephien A, Matson C, Sanders RW, Mir HR. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Feb 01; 34(2):959-965. PubMed ID: 37779131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]