These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 21330721

  • 1. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E, Ernst M, Godehardt M, Hein A, Herr J, Kazner C, Melin T, Cikurel H, Aharoni A, Messalem R, Brenner A, Jekel M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Removal of trace organic contaminants by an MBR comprising a mixed culture of bacteria and white-rot fungi.
    Nguyen LN, Hai FI, Yang S, Kang J, Leusch FD, Roddick F, Price WE, Nghiem LD.
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Nov; 148():234-41. PubMed ID: 24050925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S, Petrovic M, Barceló D.
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R, Lesjean B, Adam C, Buisson H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 Feb; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G, Kekre K, Wei Z, Lee TC, Viswanath B, Seah H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Feb; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H, Van Roy S, Dotremont C, Miller J, Knepper T.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004 Feb; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY, Chen ZL, Liang H, Li X, Wang ZZ, Li GB.
    Water Sci Technol; 2009 Feb; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Spérandio M, Masse A, Espinosa-Bouchot MC, Cabassud C.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Feb; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Lesjean B, Rosenberger S, Laabs C, Jekel M, Gnirss R, Amy G.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Feb; 51(6-7):1-8. PubMed ID: 16003955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.