These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 2133380

  • 1. Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators.
    Gross M, Nemcovsky C, Friedlander LD.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2133380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
    Palaskar JN, Joshi N, Gullapalli P, Shah P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK, Goyal S.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Feb; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.
    Anusha CV, Singh AA, Sam G, Sangwan B, Shilpa M, Kamath AG.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr 01; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of three different recording materials on the reproducibility of condylar guidance registrations in three semi-adjustable articulators.
    Gross M, Nemcovsky C, Tabibian Y, Gazit E.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Mar 01; 25(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 9578229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative study of condylar inclination settings in two types of semiadjustable articulators.
    Zabarović D, Vojvodić D, Katanec D, Jerolimov V, Carek V, Vusić J.
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun 01; 33(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 19662760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
    dos Santos J, Nelson S, Nowlin T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan 01; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Verifying the reliability of interchanging casts with semiadjustable articulators.
    Cowan RD, Sanchez RA, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Hayden WJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991 Jan 01; 4(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 1810317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P, Millstein P, Maya A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar 01; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
    Cordray FE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May 01; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
    Kumar CD, Selvaraj S, Mohan J, Raju R.
    Ann Afr Med; 2023 May 01; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures.
    Javid NS, Porter MR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Oct 01; 34(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1100807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery.
    O'Malley AM, Milosevic A.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun 01; 38(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 10864723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
    Kubrak J.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998 Jun 01; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Interchangeability of a semiadjustable articulator.
    Chung CC, Chai J, Jameson LM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun 01; 14(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 12066637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Study of the acceptability of lateral interocclusal records by a modular articulator.
    Abdullah MA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct 01; 74(4):408-11. PubMed ID: 8531161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Bennett angle. Clinical comparison of different recording methods.
    Boulos PJ, Adib SM, Naltchayan LJ.
    N Y State Dent J; 2008 Mar 01; 74(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 18450187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reproducibility of wax interocclusal records on different articulators.
    Boulos PJ.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018 Mar 01; 29(6):755-759. PubMed ID: 30589004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.