These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

243 related items for PubMed ID: 21338505

  • 1. Simulated evolution applied to study the genetic code optimality using a model of codon reassignments.
    Santos J, Monteagudo A.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb 21; 12():56. PubMed ID: 21338505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Inclusion of the fitness sharing technique in an evolutionary algorithm to analyze the fitness landscape of the genetic code adaptability.
    Santos J, Monteagudo Á.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar 27; 18(1):195. PubMed ID: 28347270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A multiobjective approach to the genetic code adaptability problem.
    de Oliveira LL, de Oliveira PS, Tinós R.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb 19; 16():52. PubMed ID: 25879480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm.
    Wnętrzak M, Błażej P, Mackiewicz D, Mackiewicz P.
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Dec 13; 18(1):192. PubMed ID: 30545289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The genetic code is very close to a global optimum in a model of its origin taking into account both the partition energy of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships.
    Caldararo F, Di Giulio M.
    Biosystems; 2022 Apr 13; 214():104613. PubMed ID: 35085754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Many alternative and theoretical genetic codes are more robust to amino acid replacements than the standard genetic code.
    Błażej P, Wnętrzak M, Mackiewicz D, Gagat P, Mackiewicz P.
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar 07; 464():21-32. PubMed ID: 30579955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Optimization of the standard genetic code according to three codon positions using an evolutionary algorithm.
    Błażej P, Wnętrzak M, Mackiewicz D, Mackiewicz P.
    PLoS One; 2018 Mar 07; 13(8):e0201715. PubMed ID: 30092017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An alternative look at code evolution: using non-canonical codes to evaluate adaptive and historic models for the origin of the genetic code.
    Morgens DW, Cavalcanti AR.
    J Mol Evol; 2013 Feb 07; 76(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 23344715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Models of genetic code structure evolution with variable number of coded labels.
    Pawlak K, Wnetrzak M, Mackiewicz D, Mackiewicz P, Błażej P.
    Biosystems; 2021 Dec 07; 210():104528. PubMed ID: 34492316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Robustness against point mutations of genetic code extensions under consideration of wobble-like effects.
    Fimmel E, Gumbel M, Starman M, Strüngmann L.
    Biosystems; 2021 Oct 07; 208():104485. PubMed ID: 34280517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Codon usage bias and mutation constraints reduce the level of error minimization of the genetic code.
    Archetti M.
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Aug 07; 59(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15486699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.