These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the internet. Beaton C, Codd RJ, Holland PA, Gateley CA. Breast J; 2008; 14(4):366-8. PubMed ID: 18537915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of information on the internet about a new device: the cervical artificial disc replacement. Qureshi SA, Koehler SM, Lin JD, Bird J, Garcia RM, Hecht AC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May 01; 37(10):881-3. PubMed ID: 21912306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability. Thompson AE, Graydon SL. J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan 01; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine. Ghobrial GM, Mehdi A, Maltenfort M, Sharan AD, Harrop JS. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Mar 01; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 24529231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease. Yeung TM, Mortensen NJ. Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan 01; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Bailey MA, Coughlin PA, Sohrabi S, Griffin KJ, Rashid ST, Troxler MA, Scott DJ. J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul 01; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of world wide web resources for identifying medical information. Johnson PT, Chen JK, Eng J, Makary MA, Fishman EK. Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep 01; 15(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18692758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing cancer treatment related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine web sites. Kim DY, Lee HR, Nam EM. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Jan 01; 18(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18771532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet. Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep 01; 147(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 22597577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hormone replacement therapy advertising: sense and nonsense on the web pages of the best-selling pharmaceuticals in Spain. Chilet-Rosell E, Martín Llaguno M, Ruiz Cantero MT, Alonso-Coello P. BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar 16; 10():134. PubMed ID: 20233393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources. Reavley NJ, Mackinnon AJ, Morgan AJ, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Hetrick SE, Killackey E, Nelson B, Purcell R, Yap MB, Jorm AF. Psychol Med; 2012 Aug 16; 42(8):1753-62. PubMed ID: 22166182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]