These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

367 related items for PubMed ID: 2135145

  • 1. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H, Takehana S, Takenaka M, Abe T.
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN.
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Some properties of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials].
    Tokushima T, Nagayama K, Tawaragi T, Hashimoto H.
    Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 18(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 2489668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G, Klettke T, Goldberg JA, Benchimol J, Perry RD, Sharma S.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Nov; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX, Bakopoulou A, Hirayama H, Garefis DP, Garefis PD.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Nov; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression].
    Kakuta K, Ogura H, Miyagawa Y, Kashiwagi Y.
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H, Hong G, Li YA, Hamada T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM, Combe EC, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials during disinfection.
    Oda Y, Matsumoto T, Sumii T.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 Feb; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8689737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N, Ueno S, Kawada E, Nakanishi K, Sumii T.
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
    Boden J, Likeman P, Clark R.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001 Apr; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials.
    Takahashi H, Finger WJ.
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 1813343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials.
    Mondon M, Ziegler C.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Jul; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.