These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


116 related items for PubMed ID: 2135330

  • 1. [Cephalometric study of the effect of orthodontic treatment on the mandible in Class II, Division 1 patients].
    Atta JY, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR.
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2135330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Araujo MT, Bolognese AM.
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Investigation of pre- and post-treatment cephalometric measurements of the subjects treated by Edgewise technique].
    Erdem A, Deniz E, Ceylan I.
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2101658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Apr; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Phan XL, Schneider BJ, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA.
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [A comparison of skeletal changes between adult and adolescent with skeletal class II malocclusions before and after therapy].
    Zhao JH, Ding Y.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct 18; 42(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 20957019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Hubbard GW, Nanda RS, Currier GF.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Oct 18; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct 18; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
    Li Q, Zheng Z, Bai D, Pang G.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov 18; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Investigation of the vertical variations in the anterior region of Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated with different techniques].
    Hamamci O.
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov 18; 2(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 2489155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Age effects on orthodontic treatment: skeletodental assessments from the Johnston analysis.
    Harris EF, Dyer GS, Vaden JL.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec 18; 100(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 1962606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
    Demir A, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA.
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct 18; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients.
    Franchi L, Baccetti T.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov 18; 76(6):950-4. PubMed ID: 17090170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical effectiveness of the Twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A.
    Stomatologija; 2005 Nov 18; 7(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16254470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Treatment of growing Class II division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias].
    Yang YM, Chen LL, Liao Q.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun 18; 20(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 21779739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB, Buschang PH, Alexander RG, Boley JC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec 18; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear.
    Braga Santos SR, Martins de Araújo T, Vogel CJ, Bastos de Oliveira M, Vieira Bittencourt MA, Braga E.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov 18; 82(6):382-390. PubMed ID: 33929557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.