These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 21354924

  • 1. [A comparative study of target vessel assessments by three- and two-dimensional quantitative coronary X-ray angiography and visual estimation].
    Hao PY, Chen AH, Song XD, Wei XL, Zhou SS, He F, Tu SX.
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Feb; 31(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21354924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I, Dato I, Todaro D, Calabrese M, Rigattieri S, Leone AM, Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Trani C, Crea F.
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun 01; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T, Grundeken MJ, Ishibashi Y, Nakatani S, Girasis C, Campos CM, Morel MA, Jonker H, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, García-García HM, Leon MB, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, TRYTON Pivotal IDE Coronary Bifurcation Trial Investigators.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep 01; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S, Huang Z, Koning G, Cui K, Reiber JH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug 01; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments.
    Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt G, Böcker D.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jul 01; 68(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 16770813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Maeng M, Reiber JH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug 01; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ, Collet C, Ishibashi Y, Généreux P, Muramatsu T, LaSalle L, Kaplan AV, Wykrzykowska JJ, Morel MA, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ, Onuma Y, Leon MB, Serruys PW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun 01; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.
    Lee JB, Chang SG, Kim SY, Lee YS, Ryu JK, Choi JY, Kim KS, Park JS.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct 01; 28(7):1627-34. PubMed ID: 22179945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
    Kan J, Gao X, Sandeep KG, Xu H, Zhao Y, Chen S, Chen F.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014 Oct 01; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye.
    Sen T, Kilit C, Astarcioglu MA, Asarcikli LD, Aksu T, Kafes H, Parspur A, Gozubuyuk G, Amasyali B.
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018 Oct 01; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve.
    Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L.
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Feb 01; 32(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 20705695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K, Chatzizisis YS, Riga M, Giannopoulos A, Antoniadis AP, Tu S, Fujino Y, Mitsouras D, Doulaverakis C, Tsampoulatidis I, Koutkias VG, Bouki K, Li Y, Chouvarda I, Cheimariotis G, Maglaveras N, Kompatsiaris I, Nakamura S, Reiber JH, Rybicki F, Karvounis H, Stefanadis C, Tousoulis D, Giannoglou GD.
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun 01; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography.
    Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai G, Van Langenhove G, Cornelis K, Vermeersch P, Convens C, Vassanelli C, Van Den Heuvel P, Van Den Branden F, Verheye S.
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Aug 01; 102(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 18638585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
    Spoon DB, Rubinshtein R, Psaltis PJ, Sandhu GS, Lennon R, Rihal CS, Lerman A.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun 01; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.
    Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Carroll JD.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Apr 01; 64(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 15744720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ, Schuijf JD, Kitslaar PH, van Werkhoven JM, de Graaf FR, Boersma E, van Velzen JE, Dijkstra J, Adame IM, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Schreur JH, Heijenbrok MW, Jukema JW, Reiber JH, Bax JJ.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul 01; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA, Tu S, Barbato E, Barbati G, Di Serafino L, De Vroey F, Toth G, Mangiacapra F, Sinagra G, De Bruyne B, Reiber JH, Wijns W.
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec 01; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, Gijsen FJ, Dijkstra J, Serruys PW, Van der Steen AF, Wentzel JJ.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-dimensional vessel analyses provide more accurate length estimations than the gold standard QCA.
    Meerkin D, Marom H, Cohen-Biton O, Einav S.
    J Interv Cardiol; 2010 Apr 01; 23(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 20236215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Volumetric intravascular ultrasound imaging to illustrate the extent of coronary plaque burden in type 2 diabetic patients.
    Schukro C, Syeda B, Yahya N, Gessl A, Holy EW, Pichler P, Derntl M, Glogar D.
    J Diabetes Complications; 2007 Apr 01; 21(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 17967711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.