These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
215 related items for PubMed ID: 21360402
1. Validation of MET estimates and step measurement using the ActivPAL physical activity logger. Harrington DM, Welk GJ, Donnelly AE. J Sports Sci; 2011 Mar; 29(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 21360402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity of Nordic Walking in young females with different peak O2 consumption. Jürimäe T, Meema K, Karelson K, Purge P, Jürimäe J. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 19469785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling. Herman Hansen B, Børtnes I, Hildebrand M, Holme I, Kolle E, Anderssen SA. J Sports Sci; 2014 Sep; 32(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 24117333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Ayabe M, Yoshioka M, Yoshitake Y, Shindo M, Ishii K, Tanaka H. Br J Nutr; 2004 Feb; 91(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 14756909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. Br J Sports Med; 2006 Sep; 40(9):779-84. PubMed ID: 16825270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy costs of walking on a dual-action treadmill in men and women. Butts NK, Knox KM, Foley TS. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 7898327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry. Haymes EM, Byrnes WC. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Heart rate and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise: a comparison of graded walking and ungraded jogging at a constant perceived exertion. Kilpatrick MW, Kraemer RR, Quigley EJ, Mears JL, Powers JM, Dedea AJ, Ferrer NF. J Sports Sci; 2009 Mar; 27(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 19204846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of subjective and objective measures of physical exertion. Skatrud-Mickelson M, Benson J, Hannon JC, Askew EW. J Sports Sci; 2011 Dec; 29(15):1635-44. PubMed ID: 21995301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Energy expenditure of walking at different intensities in Brazilian college women. Anjos LA, Wahrlich V, Bossan FM, Salies MN, Silva PB. Clin Nutr; 2008 Feb; 27(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 17981375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of an activPAL accelerometry count-based model of physical activity intensity in adults. O'Brien MW, Wu Y, Johns JA, Poitras J, Kimmerly DS. Med Eng Phys; 2021 Sep; 95():45-50. PubMed ID: 34479692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-retest reliability of step counts with the ActivPAL™ device in common daily activities. Dahlgren G, Carlsson D, Moorhead A, Häger-Ross C, McDonough SM. Gait Posture; 2010 Jul; 32(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 20655228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]