These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Neher T, Wagener KC, Latzel M. Hear Res; 2017 Sep 01; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T. Hear Res; 2017 Feb 01; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment. Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H. Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb 01; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility. Valderrama JT, Beach EF, Yeend I, Sharma M, Van Dun B, Dillon H. Hear Res; 2018 Aug 01; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss. Mackersie CL, Dewey J, Guthrie LA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug 01; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults. Başkent D, van Engelshoven S, Galvin JJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 01; 135(3):EL147-53. PubMed ID: 24606308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm. Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep 01; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C. Hear Res; 2017 Jul 01; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing. Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA. Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners. Phatak SA, Grant KW. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug 13; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 13; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: No evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure. Guest H, Munro KJ, Prendergast G, Millman RE, Plack CJ. Hear Res; 2018 Jul 13; 364():142-151. PubMed ID: 29680183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels. Wilson RH, McArdle R. Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep 13; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. Sommers MS, Humes LE. J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May 13; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]