These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 21361449

  • 21. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS, Allen SL.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ, Pittman AL.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C, Fu QJ.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise.
    Woods DL, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Ua Cruadhlaoich MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20329860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG, Liu S.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
    Magnusson L.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.
    Casserly ED.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2791-800. PubMed ID: 25994707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N, Nie KB, Gao SK, Zeng FG.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10466568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor.
    Weiss MR.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Aug; 30(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 8263822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Study on the effect of spectral details encoding in speech processing on Mandarin recognition for cochlear implants users with speech maskers].
    Guan T, Xu T, Ye D.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18610637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation.
    Fredelake S, Hohmann V.
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):76-90. PubMed ID: 22465681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.