These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 21362412

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA, Elias LJ.
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries.
    Carlsen AN, Maslovat D, Chua R, Franks IM.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul 02; 18(10):1067-70. PubMed ID: 17558298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA, Elias LJ.
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan 02; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dorsal stream contributions to perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA, Schneider O, Gutwin C, Elias LJ.
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Mar 02; 18(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 22133034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG, Dobkins KR.
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun 02; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA, Castine BR, Loetscher T, Nicholls ME.
    Cortex; 2015 Mar 02; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Does a causal relation exist between the functional hemispheric asymmetries of visual processing subsystems?
    Andresen DR, Marsolek CJ.
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov 02; 59(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 16157436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W, Ingram P, Minor S.
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr 02; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of opposing lateral visuospatial asymmetries in the upper and lower visual fields.
    Loughnane GM, Shanley JP, Lalor EC, O'Connell RG.
    Cortex; 2015 Feb 02; 63():220-31. PubMed ID: 25282061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I, Elias LJ.
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec 02; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.
    Liu L, Ioannides AA.
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul 15; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H, Tallus J, Hämäläinen H.
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec 15; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs.
    van der Lubbe RH, Schölvinck ML, Kenemans JL, Postma A.
    Neuropsychologia; 2006 Dec 15; 44(9):1547-59. PubMed ID: 16513145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms reduces the global processing bias of healthy individuals.
    Bultitude JH, Woods JM.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May 15; 48(6):1750-6. PubMed ID: 20219496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli.
    Lupien S, Lafrance MS, Lecours AR.
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar 15; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Free viewing perceptual asymmetries for judgment of brightness and quantity: dependence on stimulus orientation.
    Elias LJ, Saucier DM, Sheerin A, Burton CL.
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Mar 15; 48(2-3):347-51. PubMed ID: 12030465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision.
    Hagenbeek RE, Van Strien JW.
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun 15; 49(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 12027390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through animals' left and right perceptual worlds.
    Vallortigara G.
    Brain Lang; 2000 Jun 15; 73(2):189-219. PubMed ID: 10856174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.