These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 21365758

  • 1. A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision.
    Colaert N, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K, Martens L.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1110-3. PubMed ID: 21365758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Generic workflow for quality assessment of quantitative label-free LC-MS analysis.
    Sandin M, Krogh M, Hansson K, Levander F.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1114-24. PubMed ID: 21298787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Quality assessments of peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics.
    Granholm V, Käll L.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1086-93. PubMed ID: 21365749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A reproducibility-based evaluation procedure for quantifying the differences between MS/MS peak intensity normalization methods.
    Degroeve S, Colaert N, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K, Martens L.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1172-80. PubMed ID: 21298791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Simulating and validating proteomics data and search results.
    Geromanos SJ, Hughes C, Golick D, Ciavarini S, Gorenstein MV, Richardson K, Hoyes JB, Vissers JP, Langridge JI.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1189-211. PubMed ID: 21298790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. RIBAR and xRIBAR: Methods for reproducible relative MS/MS-based label-free protein quantification.
    Colaert N, Gevaert K, Martens L.
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul 01; 10(7):3183-9. PubMed ID: 21604685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comprehensive comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering.
    Wang H, Alvarez S, Hicks LM.
    J Proteome Res; 2012 Jan 01; 11(1):487-501. PubMed ID: 22059437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Quality meets quantity - quality control, data standards and repositories.
    Eisenacher M, Schnabel A, Stephan C.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1031-6. PubMed ID: 21365750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A stringent approach to improve the quality of nitrotyrosine peptide identifications.
    Ghesquière B, Helsens K, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1094-8. PubMed ID: 21298788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. iTRAQ protein quantification: a quality-controlled workflow.
    Burkhart JM, Vaudel M, Zahedi RP, Martens L, Sickmann A.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 21328540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quality control in LC-MS/MS.
    Köcher T, Pichler P, Swart R, Mechtler K.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 21360669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The good, the bad, the ugly: validating the mass spectrometric analysis of modified peptides.
    Beck F, Lewandrowski U, Wiltfang M, Feldmann I, Geiger J, Sickmann A, Zahedi RP.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1099-109. PubMed ID: 21298789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Elective affinities--bioinformatic analysis of proteomic mass spectrometry data.
    Li X, Pizarro A, Grosser T.
    Arch Physiol Biochem; 2009 Dec 01; 115(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 19911947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quality control metrics for LC-MS feature detection tools demonstrated on Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteomic profiles.
    Piening BD, Wang P, Bangur CS, Whiteaker J, Zhang H, Feng LC, Keane JF, Eng JK, Tang H, Prakash A, McIntosh MW, Paulovich A.
    J Proteome Res; 2006 Jul 01; 5(7):1527-34. PubMed ID: 16823959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data.
    Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R.
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Jan 01; 7(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18173218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quality control of nano-LC-MS systems using stable isotope-coded peptides.
    Burkhart JM, Premsler T, Sickmann A.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1049-57. PubMed ID: 21328538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On the beta-binomial model for analysis of spectral count data in label-free tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    Pham TV, Piersma SR, Warmoes M, Jimenez CR.
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb 01; 26(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 20007255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Toward a standardized urine proteome analysis methodology.
    Court M, Selevsek N, Matondo M, Allory Y, Garin J, Masselon CD, Domon B.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1160-71. PubMed ID: 21328537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Systematic quantification of peptides/proteins in urine using selected reaction monitoring.
    Selevsek N, Matondo M, Sanchez Carbayo M, Aebersold R, Domon B.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1135-47. PubMed ID: 21360671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quantitative protein profiling by mass spectrometry using label-free proteomics.
    Haqqani AS, Kelly JF, Stanimirovic DB.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008 Mar 01; 439():241-56. PubMed ID: 18370108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.