These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

444 related items for PubMed ID: 21378574

  • 21. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE, Flom RE, Bullimore MA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS, Szlyk JP, Ardickas Z, Alexander KR, Wilensky JT.
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Wilensky JT, Hawkins A.
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001 Apr; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.
    Thakur S, Ichhpujani P, Kumar S, Kaur R, Sood S.
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 29755121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability.
    Elliott DB, Hurst MA, Weatherill J.
    Eye (Lond); 1990 Aug; 4 ( Pt 5)():712-7. PubMed ID: 2282946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Relation of visual function to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.
    Fisher JB, Jacobs DA, Markowitz CE, Galetta SL, Volpe NJ, Nano-Schiavi ML, Baier ML, Frohman EM, Winslow H, Frohman TC, Calabresi PA, Maguire MG, Cutter GR, Balcer LJ.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 16406539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effects of spherical and astigmatic defocus on acuity and contrast sensitivity: a comparison of three clinical charts.
    Bradley A, Thomas T, Kalaher M, Hoerres M.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 1891193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Design and validation of a chart-based measure of the limits of spatial contrast sensitivity.
    Adhikari P, Carter DD, Feigl B, Zele AJ.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-122. PubMed ID: 34755353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB, Whitaker D.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR, Derlacki DJ, Fishman GA.
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9. PubMed ID: 7645278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM, Davey PG, McCray KL, Paronian V, Seitz AR.
    J Vis; 2016 Dec 01; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Influence of type and severity of pure forms of age-related cataract on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Italian American Cataract Study Group.
    Maraini G, Rosmini F, Graziosi P, Tomba MC, Bonacini M, Cotichini R, Pasquini P, Sperduto RD.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Jan 01; 35(1):262-7. PubMed ID: 8300354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Nielsen E, Hjortdal J.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec 01; 90(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 21834927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effect of tinted soft contact lens wear on functional visual acuity and higher-order aberrations.
    Watanabe K, Kaido M, Ishida R, Dogru M, Negishi K, Tsubota K.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun 01; 37(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 24721637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The development & evaluation of two vision screening tools for correctable visual loss in older people.
    Jessa Z, Evans BJ, Thomson DW.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul 01; 32(4):332-48. PubMed ID: 22670892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB, Whitaker D, Bonette L.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct 01; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J, Wicks J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun 01; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a randomized prospective study.
    Rocha KM, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Yamada AC, Bottós K, Bottós J, Morimoto L, Nosé W.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Nov 01; 142(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 17056359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep 01; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [The influence of IOL implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision 2 and 4 months after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 Apr 01; 62(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16640052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.