These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

352 related items for PubMed ID: 21382090

  • 21. Early effect of platelet-rich plasma on bone healing in combination with an osteoconductive material in rat cranial defects.
    Plachokova AS, van den Dolder J, Stoelinga PJ, Jansen JA.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 17348890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Superior effect of MD05, beta-tricalcium phosphate coated with recombinant human growth/differentiation factor-5, compared to conventional bone substitutes in the rat calvarial defect model.
    Poehling S, Pippig SD, Hellerbrand K, Siedler M, Schütz A, Dony C.
    J Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 77(9):1582-90. PubMed ID: 16945037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Bone formation in calvarial defects of Sprague-Dawley rats by transplantation of calcium phosphate glass.
    Moon HJ, Kim KN, Kim KM, Choi SH, Kim CK, Kim KD, LeGeros RZ, Lee YK.
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Sep 01; 74(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 15983995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Use of bovine bone graft and bone membrane in defects surgically created in the cranial vault of rabbits. Histologic comparative analysis.
    Queiroz TP, Hochuli-Vieira E, Gabrielli MA, Cancian DC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Sep 01; 21(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16519179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
    Carpio L, Loza J, Lynch S, Genco R.
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov 01; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials. A histological and histometric study in rat tibias.
    Melo LG, Nagata MJ, Bosco AF, Ribeiro LL, Leite CM.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec 01; 16(6):683-91. PubMed ID: 16307575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Combined implantation of particulate dentine, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss) for bone regeneration in rats.
    Su-Gwan K, Hak-Kyun K, Sung-Chul L.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct 01; 29(5):282-8. PubMed ID: 11673923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Guided osteogenesis using synthetic membranes and alloplastic materials: a pilot study.
    Aybar B, Günhan O, Bilgiç L, Emes Y.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb 01; 34(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12666860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Growth factors and bone regeneration. Implications of barrier membranes.
    Zellin G.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1998 Feb 01; 129():7-65. PubMed ID: 9672999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Closure of critical sized defects with allogenic and alloplastic bone substitutes.
    Clokie CM, Moghadam H, Jackson MT, Sandor GK.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Jan 01; 13(1):111-21; discussion 122-3. PubMed ID: 11887007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Bone healing following the use of hydroxyapatite or ionomeric bone substitutes alone or combined with a guided bone regeneration technique: an animal study.
    Salata LA, Craig GT, Brook IM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Jan 01; 13(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 9509779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Biomechanical evaluation of rat skull defects, 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation with osteopromotive substances.
    Jones L, Thomsen JS, Mosekilde L, Bosch C, Melsen B.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec 01; 35(8):350-7. PubMed ID: 17951064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Osteogenic effect of tricalcium phosphate substituted by magnesium associated with Genderm® membrane in rat calvarial defect model.
    Costa NM, Yassuda DH, Sader MS, Fernandes GV, Soares GD, Granjeiro JM.
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Apr 01; 61():63-71. PubMed ID: 26838825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Latex use as an occlusive membrane for guided bone regeneration.
    Ereno C, Guimarães SA, Pasetto S, Herculano RD, Silva CP, Graeff CF, Tavano O, Baffa O, Kinoshita A.
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec 01; 95(3):932-9. PubMed ID: 20845492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Guided bone regeneration in calvarial bone defects using polytetrafluoroethylene membranes.
    Bosch C, Melsen B, Vargervik K.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Jul 01; 32(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 7548104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Biological properties of an anti-bacterial membrane for guided bone regeneration: an experimental study in rats.
    Zhang J, Xu Q, Huang C, Mo A, Li J, Zuo Y.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar 01; 21(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 20074245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Real-time-guided bone regeneration around standardized critical size calvarial defects using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and collagen membrane with and without using tricalcium phosphate: an in vivo micro-computed tomographic and histologic experiment in rats.
    Al-Hezaimi K, Ramalingam S, Al-Askar M, ArRejaie AS, Nooh N, Jawad F, Aldahmash A, Atteya M, Wang CY.
    Int J Oral Sci; 2016 Mar 30; 8(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27025260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Histomorphometric evaluation of natural mineral combined with a synthetic cell-binding peptide (P-15) in critical-size defects in the rat calvaria.
    Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Tal H, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS, Weinreb M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Mar 30; 23(6):1063-70. PubMed ID: 19216275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) on healing bone defects: a histological study in rabbits.
    Aslan M, Simsek G, Dayi E.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May 15; 5(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 15150639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.