These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1079 related items for PubMed ID: 21389856

  • 1. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D, Bazo D.
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T, Moore BC, Gatehouse S.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Feb; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L, Doherty KA, Carney LH, Kikkeri HN.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
    Başkent D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K, Jongman A, Wade T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 54.