These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

929 related items for PubMed ID: 21398574

  • 1. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, Cammisa FP, Goldstein JA, Spivak JM.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr 20; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Commentary on an article by Rick Delamarter, MD, et al.: "Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level degenerative lumbar disc disease. Results at twenty-four months".
    Schoenfeld AJ.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr 20; 93(8):e41. PubMed ID: 21398573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL.
    Spine J; 2009 May 20; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan 15; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B.
    Spine J; 2009 Apr 15; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
    Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul 15; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov 01; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
    Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep 01; 1(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 15346999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ, Heider F, Wiechert K, Hitzl W, Ishak B, Mayer MH.
    Spine J; 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.