These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


240 related items for PubMed ID: 21415634

  • 1. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
    Yim JH, Ryu DM, Lee BS, Kwon YD.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
    Rabba JA, Suhaimi FM, Mat Jafri MZ, Jaafar HA, Osman ND.
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Kiattavorncharoen S, Jirajariyavej B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015 May; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC, Zitzmann NU, Walter C, Schulze RK.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
    Garcia Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Gründler K, Visser H, Hirsch E.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
    Felix RP, Shinkai RSA, Rockenbach MIB.
    Gen Dent; 2018 Oct; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation.
    Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG.
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():46-60. PubMed ID: 22376097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
    Batista WO, Navarro MV, Maia AF.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Comparison of mesiodistal tooth angulations determined through traditional panoramic radiographs and cone beam CT panoramic images].
    Lei Q, Zhou L, Lei L, Wang Y.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 32(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 25241531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Azeredo F, de Menezes LM, Enciso R, Weissheimer A, de Oliveira RB.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants.
    Schulze RK, Berndt D, d'Hoedt B.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 19845706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
    Liu S, Wen F, Chen H, Liu Y.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Shading correction algorithm for improvement of cone-beam CT images in radiotherapy.
    Marchant TE, Moore CJ, Rowbottom CG, MacKay RI, Williams PC.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct 21; 53(20):5719-33. PubMed ID: 18824785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Will LA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug 21; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine.
    Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct 21; 134(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18929276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning.
    Mahdian M, Moghaddam EJ, Alzahrani A, Rengasamy K, Tadinada A.
    Implant Dent; 2014 Aug 21; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, López-Quiles J.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 May 01; 13(5):E307-12. PubMed ID: 18449115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
    Flores-Mir C, Rosenblatt MR, Major PW, Carey JP, Heo G.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 May 01; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT.
    Peck JL, Sameshima GT, Miller A, Worth P, Hatcher DC.
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar 01; 77(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 17319753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.