These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
192 related items for PubMed ID: 21424255
41. The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Norman JF, Norman HF, Clayton AM, Lianekhammy J, Zielke G. Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 15129753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Loss of imagery phenomenology with intact visuo-spatial task performance: a case of 'blind imagination'. Zeman AZ, Della Sala S, Torrens LA, Gountouna VE, McGonigle DJ, Logie RH. Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):145-55. PubMed ID: 19733188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Murray MM, Wallace MT, Lacey S, Sathian K. ; 2012 Jan. PubMed ID: 22593875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Bouba or kiki with and without vision: Shape-audio regularities and mental images. Graven T, Desebrock C. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():200-212. PubMed ID: 29982038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perception. Peltier S, Stilla R, Mariola E, LaConte S, Hu X, Sathian K. Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb 01; 45(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 16616940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Superior haptic-to-visual shape matching in autism spectrum disorders. Nakano T, Kato N, Kitazawa S. Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr 01; 50(5):696-703. PubMed ID: 22245010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition. Woods AT, O'Modhrain S, Newell FN. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun 01; 4(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 15460932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch. Helbig HB, Ernst MO. Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun 01; 179(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 17225091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations. Lacey S, Pappas M, Kreps A, Lee K, Sathian K. Exp Brain Res; 2009 Sep 01; 198(2-3):329-37. PubMed ID: 19484467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Spatial imagery relies on a sensory independent, though sensory sensitive, functional organization within the parietal cortex: a fMRI study of angle discrimination in sighted and congenitally blind individuals. Bonino D, Ricciardi E, Bernardi G, Sani L, Gentili C, Vecchi T, Pietrini P. Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb 01; 68():59-70. PubMed ID: 25575449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Child development and the role of visual experience in the use of spatial and non-spatial features in haptic object perception. Overvliet KE, Postma A, Röder B. J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 Jun 01; 242():105885. PubMed ID: 38471382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Development of visuo-haptic transfer for object recognition in typical preschool and school-aged children. Purpura G, Cioni G, Tinelli F. Child Neuropsychol; 2018 Jul 01; 24(5):657-670. PubMed ID: 28427295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Visual object imagery and autobiographical memory: Object Imagers are better at remembering their personal past. Vannucci M, Pelagatti C, Chiorri C, Mazzoni G. Memory; 2016 Jul 01; 24(4):455-70. PubMed ID: 25751732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Spatial forms and mental imagery. Price MC. Cortex; 2009 Jul 01; 45(10):1229-45. PubMed ID: 19665116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. Lawson R. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug 01; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Object and spatial visualizers have different object-processing patterns: behavioral and ERP evidence. Li S, Gong D, Jia S, Zhang W, Ma Y. Neuroreport; 2011 Dec 07; 22(17):860-4. PubMed ID: 21968324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Mechanisms of cross-modal priming between visual and haptic modalities]. Morimoto T, Hishitani S. Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Dec 07; 74(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 15029762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection and Discrimination Thresholds for Haptic Gratings on Electrostatic Tactile Displays. Jiao J, Wang D, Zhang Y, Cao D, Visell Y, Guo X, Sun X. IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019 Dec 07; 12(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 30047900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Two forms of spatial imagery: neuroimaging evidence. Thompson WL, Slotnick SD, Burrage MS, Kosslyn SM. Psychol Sci; 2009 Oct 07; 20(10):1245-53. PubMed ID: 19765238 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects? Lacey S, Campbell C, Sathian K. Perception; 2007 Oct 07; 36(10):1513-21. PubMed ID: 18265834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]